Phase 1 — Find
1500+ code reviews across 310+ vulnerability classes — each one a production-realistic snippet in the language your team ships. Five candidate blocks, one real flaw.
Built for AppSec teams · Mapped to your audit
The Developer SecurityPlatform for theAI Era
Secure coding + compliance evidence for the AI era — OWASP LLM, Agentic AI and Secure AI-Assisted Development mapped to EU AI Act, ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF, alongside Web/API/Mobile Top 10 tied to PCI DSS and ISO 27001.
0
Vuln Classes
0
Code Reviews
0
Attack Scenarios
0
Engineering Stacks
PCI DSS 4.0·ISO 27001·OWASP Top 10·EU CRA·EU AI Act·ISO 42001·NIST AI RMF
Evidence exported
PCI 6.2.4 · CWE-89 · signed PDF
12async getUser(req) {
13 const q = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${req.params.id}`;
14 return db.query(q);
15}
scanning · finding A03:2021 — InjectionCWE-89OWASP A03:2021PCI 6.5.1ISO 27001 A.8.28EU AI Act Art. 15
How it works
Two phases per challenge.
Phase 1: spot the vulnerable block in production code. Phase 2: pick the right fix among four plausible candidates — not "one obvious answer."
Phase 2 — Fix
Smart distractors — each wrong fix is a real-world AppSec mistake (escape-only, regex-validation, ORM-without-binding) with the explanation of why it fails. Devs learn the difference between a fix and a mitigation.
Guided attack walkthroughs
From recon to exploit to fix — step by step.
114 scenarios. 1537 interactive steps. Each one drops the engineer into a simulated browser, terminal and intercepting proxy — running recon, landing the exploit, and then closing the gap in code. One attack class, one short focused session.
114
scenarios
1537
interactive steps
~17m
avg walkthrough
Written in your stack
Not generic pseudocode. Your idioms.
Each engineer picks their stack on first visit. Every challenge then loads in the language and framework they actually ship — Python f-strings, Go's fmt.Sprintf, C#'s string interpolation, Java's PreparedStatement — not a stripped-down pseudocode that maps to nothing in production.
Backend
- JavaScript
- TypeScript
- C#
- Java
- Python
- Go
- PHP
Frontend
- React TS · JS
- Vue TS · JS
- Angular TS · JS
Mobile
- Swift
- Kotlin
15 language & framework targets across backend, frontend and mobile — each challenge rendered in idiomatic code for the stack you pick.
Customer Outcomes
Enterprise teams cut recurring findingsand standardized secure coding.
Anonymized customer outcomes from banks, fintechs and insurers. Named reference calls available on approval.
Insurance
47%
reduction in OWASP findings
International Insurance Group
4,600 Employees · 480 Developers
Financial Technology
42%
reduction in recurring findings
Global FinTech Company
1,300 Employees · 340 Developers
Commercial Banking
38%
reduction in repeated findings
Regional Commercial Bank
3,900 Employees · 560 Developers
Enterprise platform
Built for the way enterprise security teams already work.
SAML 2.0 with JIT provisioning, SCIM 2.0 lifecycle sync, SCORM 1.2/2004 for any LMS, and a multi-tenant admin plane with role-based delegation. None of it bolt-on — all of it live from Day 1.
SAML 2.0 / OIDC
SSO with JIT Provisioning
Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, OneLogin, or any SAML 2.0 / OIDC IdP. JIT user creation on first sign-in — no manual onboarding step.
SCIM 2.0
User Lifecycle Sync
Automatic user provisioning and deprovisioning from your IdP — no ghost accounts when people leave.
SCORM 1.2 / 2004
Runs inside Your LMS
Launches from Moodle, Cornerstone, SAP SuccessFactors, Docebo, or any SCORM-compliant LMS. Completion + bookmark sync back through the standard runtime.
PLATFORM → COMPANY → ORG → TEAM
Multi-Tenant Hierarchy
Isolate data and admin scope across companies, business units, and squads — with role-based delegation per layer.
IMMUTABLE TRAIL
Audit Log
Every sign-in, assignment, completion and admin action recorded with actor, role, IP and metadata — queryable and exportable for QSA, SOC 2 and ISO audits.
ASSIGNMENTS & ANALYTICS
Deadlines, Teams, Skill Gaps
Assign by topic, framework or attack scenario — to a user, a team or the whole org. Track completion, scores and per-team gaps from one admin dashboard.
Compliance mapping
Every assignment, mapped to the framework you report against.
PCI DSS 4.0.1
§6.2.2 secure-coding training
Per-requirement evidence: §6.2.2 developer training mapped to OWASP categories and CWE clusters — ready for QSA review without spreadsheet archaeology.
ISO 27001:2022
Annex A.8.28 secure coding
A.8.28 secure-coding control evidence and A.6.3 awareness training, tied to per-team completion and per-topic CWE coverage.
EU CRA Annex I
Secure-by-design requirements
Essential cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements — per-team coverage tracked against Annex I (1) and (2).
OWASP TOP 10
Web · API · Mobile · Client · LLM · Agentic · AI Dev
Every challenge tagged to OWASP categories across 9 frameworks — Web, API, Mobile, Client-Side, Cloud-Native, CI/CD, LLM, Agentic AI, AI-Dev-Tools — with the underlying CWE for each.
EU AI ACT
Articles 9–15
High-risk AI system requirements — per-developer evidence for Article 15 cybersecurity, Article 12 logs, and Article 14 human oversight.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Annex A AI controls
AI Management System evidence — A.6.2.6 impact assessment, A.8.2 V&V, A.8.4 monitoring mapped to developer training.
NIST AI RMF 1.0
Govern · Map · Measure · Manage
Federal AI risk baseline — MEASURE-2.7 security, MAP-1.1 system context, MANAGE-2.4 risk treatment per-developer evidence.
Every challenge is pre-tagged to the framework it satisfies — so audit time isn't a fire drill, it's a query.
See how it fits
your audit cadence.
30 minutes with our team. We'll walk through the admin dashboard, the PCI / ISO / OWASP mappings, and how SSO and SCIM light up for your IdP.