Language-specific, role-mapped, hands-on training with per-developer evidence your QSA will accept — the first time, on the first cycle.
Requirement 6.2.2 names load-bearing elements — language-specific content, job-function relevance, hands-on practice, per-developer evidence. Our platform was architected to satisfy each one, not retrofitted onto a video library.
Every challenge, example, and fix rendered in the language your developer actually writes — JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, C#, Go, Swift, Kotlin, PHP, Ruby, Rust, and more. No pseudocode. No "principles transfer" disclaimers.
Assign distinct paths per role — backend engineers on payment services, frontend engineers on checkout UI, mobile engineers on wallet apps. Security leads control the mapping. Developers see only what their role requires.
Developers produce output — classify vulnerable code, write fixes, review pull requests with planted flaws. Assessment is built into each challenge. Passive video consumption is not our architecture; demonstrated capability is.
System-of-record exports: per-learner, per-module, timestamps, scores, attempt counts. Currency reporting against the rolling 12-month window. The exact artifact set your QSA requests, ready on day one.
A QSA walking into a 6.2.2 evidence review is looking for seven specific artifacts. Our platform produces all seven — automatically, continuously, and in the formats assessors read.
Auto-generated curriculum description per language and role, version-controlled with a changelog the QSA can inspect.
Living roster of every in-scope developer with assigned curriculum path. Syncs with your HR or SSO so role changes update automatically.
Each module tracked: date completed, score, attempts, remediation. CSV and PDF exports. Per-learner audit trail, ready to attach to the ROC.
Every developer's most recent training date, rolling 12-month status, and upcoming expiries flagged at 60 and 30 days before the deadline.
Separate module tracking for SAST, DAST, SCA, and IAST tool usage training — the conditional clause most programs forget to evidence.
Curriculum mapped to 6.2.4 attack categories and OWASP Top 10. Gaps identified with documented remediation plan and timeline.
Annual curriculum review evidence — updates tied to new attack classes, internal incident data, and developer feedback.
A thirty-minute call is usually all it takes to know if we are the right fit for your 2026 cycle. We walk your team through the 6.2.2 bar, map our program to your stack, and show you the evidence package your QSA has already seen work.