Language-specific, hands-on developer training that produces the evidence CE-marking conformity assessment expects — before the late-2027 deadline.
The CRA names load-bearing elements — Annex I essential cybersecurity requirements, vulnerability handling, conformity assessment, and incident reporting. Our platform was architected to satisfy each one, not retrofitted onto a video library.
Training delivers the secure coding patterns that prevent common Annex I §1 violations — default deny, input validation, output encoding, integrity protection — so products with digital elements ship resilient by design, not retrofitted in patch cycles.
Annex I §2 obliges manufacturers to process and disclose vulnerabilities throughout the product lifetime. Training covers SBOM generation, CVE triage, and the coordinated disclosure workflow that auditors review during conformity assessment.
Article 13 demands documentation produced during development that demonstrates conformity. Training records, secure-by-design review evidence, and SDLC artifacts all flow into the technical file — and survive a notified body's inspection.
Article 14 sets a strict cadence: 24-hour early warning, 72-hour initial assessment, 14-day final report. Training covers the engineering side — detection, classification, and the artifacts the manufacturer must preserve to defend each filing.
A notified body or internal conformity reviewer walking into a CRA technical-file review is looking for specific artifacts. Our platform produces seven of them — automatically, continuously, and in the formats reviewers read.
Transcripts per learner with explicit cross-references to Annex I §1 essential cybersecurity requirements and §2 vulnerability handling controls.
Language-specific curriculum, mapped to the OWASP categories underlying Annex I §1 — so the link between training content and the regulation is explicit, not implied.
Demonstrated capability — per developer, per topic — proving learners can recognize and avoid Annex I violations, not just attend a session.
Evidence of secure-by-design review applied on each major release — the Article 13 hook that conformity assessors look for in the technical file.
Training records covering SBOM, CVE triage, and coordinated disclosure — the Annex I §2 hook that proves the manufacturer's process is staffed and competent.
Training records packaged as part of the technical file — the documentation set Article 13 conformity assessment expects to find on first inspection.
Curriculum versioning aligned to the ENISA threat landscape and the latest Annex I clarifications, with a changelog the conformity reviewer can inspect.
A thirty-minute call is usually all it takes to know if we are the right fit for your CRA conformity timeline. We walk your team through Annex I, map our program to your stack and product portfolio, and show you the evidence package conformity reviewers have already accepted.