Language-specific, role-mapped, hands-on training with per-developer evidence that ties cleanly to CC1.4, CC2.3, CC7.1, and CC8.1 — ready for your auditor on day one.
SOC 2 auditors evaluate developer security training across multiple Trust Services Criteria — competence, communication, anomaly detection, and change management. Our platform was architected to satisfy each of them, not retrofitted onto a video library.
Evidence that developers receive security training appropriate to their role — with role-mapped curriculum, completion records, and assessment outcomes that demonstrate competence rather than mere attendance.
Training reinforces your secure coding policies and standards in the languages your engineers actually use. Learners encounter the same controls, terminology, and code paths your auditor will see in your policy document.
Curriculum covers the logging, monitoring, and incident response patterns developers must build into production code — so detection capability is engineered in, not bolted on after the fact.
Training reinforces that every code change considers security. Per-developer review evidence ties back to training records, giving your auditor a clean line from policy to competence to actual change discipline.
A SOC 2 auditor reviewing developer training is looking for a specific set of artifacts that tie competence and change discipline to the Trust Services Criteria. Our platform produces all of them — automatically, continuously, and in the formats auditors read.
Full per-learner record with role and primary language attached, version-controlled, exportable to the formats your auditor and audit-management platform accept.
Auto-generated curriculum description per language and stack, scoped to the systems inside your audit boundary. No "principles transfer" disclaimers; native content for every language your platform actually runs.
Score, attempt count, remediation outcomes — evidence of demonstrated competence, not merely time-in-seat. The artifact CC1.4 reviewers ask for and most LMS exports cannot produce.
Code review challenge outcomes tied to each developer — the CC8.1 hook auditors use to confirm that change management discipline is real and individually attributable, not just process documentation.
Version-controlled curriculum updates with a changelog tied to new attack classes, internal incident data, and developer feedback. Auditors see when content moved and why.
CSV and JSON exports with immutable timestamps. Drop straight into your audit-management tool or hand to the auditor. Per-learner audit trail, ready to attach to the SOC 2 report workpapers.
We share our own SOC 2 report under NDA so your vendor risk team can close out the third-party review on us. (Note: Type II report availability is on our roadmap; current customers can request the latest status.)
A thirty-minute call is usually all it takes to know if we are the right fit for your 2026 audit. We walk your team through the relevant TSC bar, map our program to your stack, and show you the evidence package your auditor will accept.